This module introduced me not only to the concept of how we must consider AT in the IEP Process but also to the lovely Morgen seen here. I mention her because I liked how this video allowed us to hear the point of view from a student who requires the use of AT. She made some very salient points about her likes and dislikes about Co-Writer, the particular writing AT she uses.
I learned the distinction between Assistive Technology and Assistive Technology services. There are differences. For example it lists examples (I love examples) of AT services such as:
1. Resource teacher will instruct on computer functions for 20 minutes daily.
2. Tech coordinator will be available for computer problems per request.
3. Physical therapist will consult for 30 minutes weekly on power wheelchair training.
As a teacher, knowing the difference between the two will help alleviate any uncertainty on my part.
To further dissuade any misconceptions, my teaching will benefit from avoiding some errant decision making by referring to the list of common errors.
These errors/misconceptions include:
1. AT is considered for students with severe disabilities only.
2. No one on the IEP team is knowledgeable regarding AT.
3. If AT is not needed, IEP team fails to document the basis of its decisions.
No comments:
Post a Comment